4.7 Article

EWS-FLI1 causes neuroepithelial defects and abrogates emigration of neural crest stem cells

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 2237-2244

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0133

关键词

neural crest stem cell; Ewing's sarcoma; EWS-FLI1; chick embryo

资金

  1. American Heart Association [0525037Y]
  2. V Foundation Scholar Award
  3. American Cancer Society Institutional research [IRG-58-007-IRG]
  4. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine SEED [RS-00249]
  5. NIH [NS36585]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most frequently occurring chromosomal translocation that gives rise to the Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT) is the chimeric fusion gene EWS-FLI1 that encodes an oncogenic protein composed of the N terminus of EWS and the C terminus of FLI1. Although the genetic basis of ESFT is fairly well understood, its putative cellular origin remains to be determined. Previous work has proposed that neural crest progenitor cells may be the causative cell type responsible for ESFT. However, surprisingly little is known about the expression pattern or role of either wild-type EWS or wild-type FLI1 in this cell population during early embryonic development. Using the developing chick embryo as a model system, we identified EWS expression in emigrating and migratory neural crest stem cells, whereas FLI1 transcripts were found to be absent in these populations and were restricted to developing endothelial cells. By ectopically expressing EWS-FLI1 or wild-type FLI1 in the developing embryo, we have been able to study the cellular transformations that ensue in the context of an in vivo model system. Our results reveal that misexpression of the chimeric EWS-FLI1 fusion gene, or wild-type FLI1, in the developing neural crest stem cell population leads to significant aberrations in neural crest development. An intriguing possibility is that misexpression of the EWS-FLI1 oncogene in neural crest-derived stem cells may be an initiating event in ESFT genesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据