4.5 Article

Analytic methods for individually randomized group treatment trials and group-randomized trials when subjects belong to multiple groups

期刊

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 13, 页码 2178-2190

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6083

关键词

individually randomized group treatment trial; group-randomized trial; intraclass correlation; mixed models

资金

  1. NIDCR [R01-DE020832, U54-DE019261]
  2. NIDDK [R01-DK072398]
  3. NCRR [K30-RR022258]
  4. NIDA [R01-DA031017]
  5. NICHD [P01-HD065647]
  6. Texas Health and Human Services Commission [529-07-0093-00001G]
  7. NHLBI [U01-HL-103561]
  8. Research Coordinating Unit for COPTR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Participants in trials may be randomized either individually or in groups and may receive their treatment either entirely individually, entirely in groups, or partially individually and partially in groups. This paper concerns cases in which participants receive their treatment either entirely or partially in groups, regardless of how they were randomized. Participants in group-randomized trials are randomized in groups, and participants in individually randomized group treatment trials are individually randomized, but participants in both types of trials receive part or all of their treatment in groups or through common change agents. Participants who receive part or all of their treatment in a group are expected to have positively correlated outcome measurements. This paper addresses a situation that occurs in group-randomized trials and individually randomized group treatment trialsparticipants receive treatment through more than one group. As motivation, we consider trials in The Childhood Obesity Prevention and Treatment Research Consortium, in which each child participant receives treatment in at least two groups. In simulation studies, we considered several possible analytic approaches over a variety of possible group structures. A mixed model with random effects for both groups provided the only consistent protection against inflated type I error rates and did so at the cost of only moderate loss of power when intraclass correlations were not large. We recommend constraining variance estimates to be positive and using the Kenward-Roger adjustment for degrees of freedom; this combination provided additional power but maintained type I error rates at the nominal level. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据