4.5 Article

Comparison of 3-Dimensional Spinal Reconstruction Accuracy Biplanar Radiographs With EOS Versus Computed Tomography

期刊

SPINE
卷 37, 期 16, 页码 1391-1397

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182518a15

关键词

scoliosis; imaging; EOS; computed tomography (CT); 3D reconstructions; low radiation; biplanar slot-scanner; validation; accuracy

资金

  1. EOS Imaging, France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Design: Experimental study for systematic evaluation of 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions from low-dose digital stereoradiography. Objective. To assess the accuracy of EOS (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions compared with 3D computed tomography (CT) and the effect spine positioning within the EOS unit has on reconstruction accuracy. Summary of Background Data. Scoliosis is a 3D deformity, but 3D morphological analyses are still rare. A new low-dose radiation digital stereoradiography system (EOS) was previously evaluated for intra/interobserver variability, but data are limited for 3D reconstruction accuracy. Methods. Three synthetic scoliotic phantoms (T1-pelvis) were scanned in upright position at 0 degrees, +/- 5 degrees, and +/- 10 degrees of axial rotation within EOS and in supine position using CT. Three-dimensional EOS reconstructions were superimposed on corresponding 3D computed tomographic reconstructions. Shape, position, and orientation accuracy were assessed for each vertebra and the entire spine. Additional routine planer clinical deformity measurements were compared: Cobb angle, kyphosis, lordosis, and pelvic incidence. Results. Mean EOS vertebral body shape accuracy was 1.1 +/- 0.2 mm (maximum 4.7 mm), with 95% confidence interval of 1.7 mm. Different anatomical vertebral regions were modeled well with root-mean-square (RMS) values from 1.2 to 1.6 mm. Position and orientation accuracy of each vertebra were high: RMS offset was 1.2 mm (maximum 3.7 mm) and RMS axial rotation was 1.9 degrees (maximum 5.8 degrees). There was no significant difference in each of the analyzed parameters (P > 0.05) associated with varying the rotational position of the phantoms in EOS machine. Planer measurements accuracy was less than 1 degrees mean difference for pelvic incidence, Cobb angle (mean 1.6 degrees/maximum 3.9 degrees), and sagittal kyphosis (mean less than 1 degrees, maximum 4.9 degrees). Conclusion. The EOS image acquisition and reconstruction software provides accurate 3D spinal representations of scoliotic spinal deformities. The results of this study provide spinal deformity surgeons evidence pertaining to this new upright 3D imaging technology that may aid in the clinical diagnosis and decision making for patients with scoliosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据