4.6 Article

CO2 Injection in Vertical and Horizontal Cores: Measurements and Numerical Simulation

期刊

SPE JOURNAL
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 331-344

出版社

SOC PETROLEUM ENG
DOI: 10.2118/135563-PA

关键词

-

资金

  1. RERI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In certain high-pressure and low-temperature reservoirs, the density of CO2 may be substantially higher than the oil density. Upon mixing of CO2 and oil, a gas phase with a high content of methane (C-1) may also appear. When the C-1 content is high, this gas phase may have a lower density than the oil. In relation to this phenomenon, we have conducted three comprehensive experiments studying CO2 injection from the top and bottom of a vertical core and injection in a horizontal core. The injection rate is 1 PV/day. This low rate allows the study of diffusion. The core diameter used in this work is 3.8 cm and the length is 27.3 cm. The tests are conducted at a pressure of 441 bar and a temperature of 60 degrees C. At 2.6 hydrocarbon pore volume injection (PVT), the coreflood results give a recovery of 98% for bottom injection, 84% for top injection, and 92% for horizontal injection. We have also conducted an extensive set of measurements to determine swelling, viscosity, and density for the calibration of an equation of state. We simulate the experiments using a state-of-the-art higher-order finite-element three-phase compositional model. The simulations suggest that the endpoint relative permeability of the CO2-rich phase may be lower than the oil phase. The results also show that Fickian diffusion should be taken into account, but that the diffusion coefficients are reduced, because the CO2/oil mixtures are in the near-critical region for much of the injection. Even for a horizontal core there is a considerable gravity effect. One main conclusion is that there may be vast differences between CO2 injection in a 1D slim tube and in a core where there may be a 2D flow. A related conclusion is that analysis of CO2 coreflooding may provide important parameters for field-scale problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据