4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Physics-Driven Interface Modeling for Drainage and Imbibition in Fractures

期刊

SPE JOURNAL
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 532-542

出版社

SOC PETROLEUM ENG
DOI: 10.2118/110448-PA

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The geometric distribution of immiscible fluid phases in fractures is not readily accessible experimentally, so aperture-scale simulations of drainage and imbibition in realistic fractures can provide valuable insight. We implement a level set method for computing the location within a fracture of the interface between two fluids controlled by capillary forces. The movement of the interface in response to changes in capillary pressure is approximated as quasistatic displacement. Fluid interfaces are thus constant mean curvature surfaces, satisfying the Young-Laplace equation. We apply a progressive quasistatic (PQS) algorithm to determine when spontaneous pore-level events occur during fluid displacement. The algorithm captures reversible and irreversible behavior. We illustrate the approach in two types of rough-walled fractures. One type is a 3D crack between irregular, impermeable surfaces; the other type is a gap between irregular 2D and 3D rain packs. We focus on the disconnected (defending) fluid volumes and (advancing) fluid main pathway as the geometric properties of the fracture are varied, notably aperture and the number of contact points between the upper and lower fracture surfaces. The curvature of the fluid/fluid interface in the plane of the fracture is often ignored by invasion percolation simulation techniques, yet it is known to influence strongly the fluid cluster properties. Our simulations establish the exact position and shape of the interface in realistic fracture geometries, from which fluid volumes, contact areas, and interface curvatures can be obtained. This establishes a new, mechanistic basis for predicting relative permeabilities in fractures and for evaluating transfer functions in dual-porosity flow models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据