4.5 Article

1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose: A cholinesterase inhibitor from Terminalia chebula

期刊

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 285-288

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2009.11.006

关键词

1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucose; Acetylcholinesterase; Butyrylcholinesterase; FRAP assay; Terminalia chebula

资金

  1. Seo Chun Gun
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [2Z03410] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0076459] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The search for a novel pharmaeotherapy from medicinal plants for neurodegenerative disorders has significantly advanced. Therefore, the present study was performed to evaluate the anticholinesterase activities of one hundred medicinal plants in Korea, where Terminalia chebula (T. chebula) fruits showed significant acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibitions. Further bioassay monitored phytochemical exploration led to the isolation of 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucose (compound 1), which showed significant AChE and BChE inhibitory effects with IC50 values of 29.9 +/- 0.3 mu M and 27.6 +/- 0.2 mu M, respectively. The inhibitory effect of compound 1 towards acetylcholinesterase was also evaluated using TLC and compared with tacrine as the positive control; the positive effect was confirmed. Furthermore, compound 1 also displayed strong antioxidant activity by the FRAP assay (IC50=4.6 +/- 0.2 mu M). In conclusion, compound I may prove to be a potential natural anti-Alzheimer source based on noteworthy AChE and BChE inhibitions, and strong antioxidant activity. (C) 2009 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据