4.7 Article

Theoretical efficiency of 3rd generation solar cells: Comparison between carrier multiplication and down-conversion

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 308-315

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.12.019

关键词

Down-conversion; Carrier multiplication; Multiple exciton generation; Entropy; Energy conversion efficiency

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences Energy Frontier Research Center (DoE-LMI-EFRC) [DOE DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. DoD
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  4. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship
  5. [32 CFR 168a]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two of the methods of exceeding the detailed balance limit for a single junction solar cell are down-converting high energy photons to produce two photons and carrier multiplication, whereby high energy photons produce more than one electron-hole pair. Both methods obey the conservation of energy in similar ways, and effectively produce a higher current in the solar cell. Due to this similarity, it has been assumed in the literature that there is no thermodynamic difference between the two methods. Here, we analyzed the two methods using a generalized approach based on Kirchhoffs law of radiation and develop a new model for carrier multiplication. We demonstrate that there is an entropic penalty to be paid for attempting to accomplish all-in-one splitting in carrier multiplication systems, giving a small thermodynamic - and therefore efficiency - advantage to spectral splitting prior to reaching the solar cell. We show this analytically using a derivation of basic thermodynamic identities; numerically by solving for the maximal efficiency: and generally using heat-generation arguments. Our result provides a new limit of entropy generation in solar cells beyond the existing literature, and a new distinction among 3rd generation photovoltaic technologies. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据