4.6 Article

3D printing of complex origami assemblages for reconfigurable structures

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 14, 期 39, 页码 8051-8059

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8sm01341a

关键词

-

资金

  1. AFOSR [FA9550-16-1-0169]
  2. NSF [CMMI-1462894, CMMI-1462895, CMMI-1538830]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11521202]
  4. National Materials Genome Project of China [2016YFB0700600]
  5. China Scholarship Council [201506010219]
  6. Raymond Allen Jones Chair at the Georgia Institute of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Origami engineering principles have recently been applied to a wide range of applications, including soft robots, stretchable electronics, and mechanical metamaterials. In order to achieve the 3D nature of engineered structures (e.g. load-bearing capacity) and capture the desired kinematics (e.g., foldability), many origami-inspired engineering designs are assembled from smaller parts and often require binding agents or additional elements for connection. Attempts at direct fabrication of 3D origami structures have been limited by available fabrication technologies and materials. Here, we propose a new method to directly 3D print origami assemblages (that mimic the behavior of their paper counterparts) with acceptable strength and load-bearing capacity for engineering applications. Our approach introduces hinge-panel elements, where the hinge regions are designed with finite thickness and length. The geometrical design of these hinge-panels, informed by both experimental and theoretical analysis, provides the desired mechanical behavior. In order to ensure foldability and repeatability, a novel photocurable elastomer system is developed and the designs are fabricated using digital light processing-based 3D printing technology. Various origami assemblages are produced to demonstrate the design flexibility and fabrication efficiency offered by our 3D printing method for origami structures with enhanced load bearing capacity and selective deformation modes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据