4.6 Article

An improved gravitational search algorithm for solving short-term economic/environmental hydrothermal scheduling

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 2783-2797

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-014-1441-3

关键词

Economic/environmental scheduling; Gravitational search algorithm; Constraints handling; Chaotic mutation; Priority index

资金

  1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Cascaded Hydropower Stations Operation and Control
  2. China Three Gorges University
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51379080]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014TS152]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an improved gravitational search algorithm (IGSA) to find the optimum solution for short-term economic/environmental hydrothermal scheduling (SEEHTS), which considers minimizing fuel cost as well as minimizing pollutant emission. In order to improve the performance of GSA, this paper firstly uses particle memory character and population social information to update velocity. Secondly, a chaotic mutation operator is embedded into GSA and a selection-operator-based greedy rule is adopted to update population. When dealing with the constraints of the SEEHTS, a modification strategy by dividing the violation water volume into several parts and randomly selecting intervals to adjust the water discharge gradually is proposed to handle the water dynamic balance constraints. Meanwhile, a new symmetrical adjusting strategy is adopted to handle reservoir storage constraints. Furthermore, the priority index strategy based on thermal power output is applied to handle system load balance constraints. To test the performance of the proposed method, simulation results have been compared with those obtained by particle swarm optimization, evolutionary programming and differential evolution reported in literature. The results show that the proposed IGSA provides the optimum solution with less fuel cost and smaller emission. So it demonstrates that IGSA is effective for solving SEEHTS problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据