4.4 Article

A two-stage epidemiologic study on prevalence of eating disorders in female university students in Wuhan, China

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-013-0694-y

关键词

Prevalence; Two-stage; Eating disorders; Community sample; China

资金

  1. National Key Technologies R&D Program (National demonstrative study on comprehensive screening, evaluation and intervention for issues of family, marriage and parent-child relation) [BAI77B05]
  2. Human development and mental health in Hubei province key laboratory open project [200902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The community prevalence of eating disorders among Chinese young women may now be similar to their western counterparts. Aim To investigate the prevalence of eating disorders (ED) in female university students in Wuhan, China, using a two-stage design. Method In stage one, 99.1% (N = 8,444) of eligible students (N = 8,521) completed the eating disorder inventory-1 (EDI-1) and a survey of relevant anthropomorphic data. A total of 421 women scored above the cutoff for EDE-1, as defined by a set of criteria similar to those of Keski-Rahkonen (Int J Eat Disord 39:754-762, 2006). 257 (61%) of these case-positive women and a random sample of case-negative women (312 out of 8,023, 4%) whose scores did not exceed the defined cut-off were interviewed using the eating disorder examination (EDE) and the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders (SCID-I). Results On interview with the SCID-I, 79 women were diagnosed with an ED. Among them, 10 had anorexia nervosa (AN), 21 bulimia nervosa (BN), and 48 binge eating disorder (BED) The results showed a prevalence rate of 1.05% (95% CI = 0.02-2.08) for AN, 2.98% (95% CI = 1.21-4.74) for BN, and 3.53% (95% CI = 1.75-5.30) for BED. Conclusion The prevalence of ED among female university students in China is now similar to that of their western counterparts, and BED is the most common ED followed by BN and AN similarly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据