4.4 Article

Risk factors for onset of multiple or long major depressive episodes versus single and short episodes

期刊

SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 48, 期 7, 页码 1067-1075

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-012-0626-2

关键词

Depression; Cohort; Epidemiology; Episodes; Duration

资金

  1. European Commission [PREDICT-QL4-CT2002-00683]
  2. VIDI grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [917-66-311]
  3. Slovenian Ministry for Research [4369-1027]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Health [PI041980, PI041771, PI042450]
  5. Spanish Network of Primary Care Research (redIAPP) [ISCIII-RETIC RD06/0018]
  6. SAMSE-RAP group
  7. UK National Health Service Research and Development office

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Major depressive disorder may vary according to number and duration of episodes. It is unclear whether risk factors for onset of multiple or long episodes of depression (MDE) differ from risk factors for the onset of single and short ones. Data were used from a cohort study of 5,256 GP attendees without major depressive disorder at baseline, who were followed up three times (predictD). The numbers and duration of MDE were noted and categorized into no episodes, single and short (a parts per thousand currency sign3 months), and multiple or long (> 3 months) episodes at follow-up. Log-binomial regression models were used to calculate relative risks between the groups for 18 risk factors examined at baseline. 165 persons (3 %) had a single and short MDE and 328 (6 %) had multiple or long MDE at follow-up. Lower education, anxiety, problems at work and financial strain significantly increased the risk of multiple or long MDE when compared to single and short MDE. Younger people were at reduced risk of multiple or long MDE. Our findings suggest that several risk factors can be identified that may help to predict onset of different types of MDE. These factors are easy to assess and may be used in the prevention of depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据