4.2 Article

A direct comparison of methods used to measure oxidized glutathione in biological samples: 2-vinylpyridine and N-ethylmaleimide

期刊

TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 589-595

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/15376516.2015.1094844

关键词

Glutathione; GSSG; N-ethylmaleimide; Tietze assay; 2-vinylpyridine; acetaminophen

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DK102142, R01 AA12916]
  2. National Center for Research Resources [5P20RR021940-07]
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [8 P20 GM103549-07]
  4. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [T32 ES007079-26A2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ratio of glutathione disulfide (GSSG) to reduced glutathione (GSH) in biological samples is a frequently used parameter of oxidative stress. As a result, many methods are developed to measure GSSG. The most popular and convenient of these relies on enzymatic cycling following the chemical masking of GSH in the sample using 2-vinylpyridine (2VP). However, 2VP is a slow reactant and its use may result in artificially high GSSG values due to oxidation of the sample over time. Fast-reacting reagents such as N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) may provide more accurate results. We performed a direct comparison of methods using 2VP and NEM. With 2VP, the percentage of total glutathione (GSH+GSSG) in the oxidized form was significantly higher in all tested tissues (kidney, lung and liver) compared to the same procedure performed using NEM. We conclude that NEM, when coupled with a simple solid-phase extraction procedure, is more accurate for the determination of GSSG. We also tested the effects of various handling and storage conditions on GSSG. A detailed description and a discussion of other methods are also included.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据