4.6 Article

Microsubthalamotomy improves sleep in patients affected by advanced Parkinson's disease

期刊

SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 637-641

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.12.016

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Sleep; Deep brain stimulation; Microsubthalamotomy; Polysomnography; Restless legs syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) improves sleep in patients affected by Parkinson's disease (PD). Since microsubthalamotomy (mSTN) shows positive effects on motor symptoms, it could improve sleep in PD patients. Our goals were: to assess the effects of mSTN on sleep in patients affected by advanced PD; and to look for a correlation between sleep and motor features after the neurosurgical procedure. Methods: Fifteen patients who underwent bilateral STN-DBS were enrolled. Subjective sleep evaluation was assessed using the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS). Data on sleep schedule and presence of restless legs syndrome (RLS) were obtained. Objective sleep,features were investigated by polysomnography (PSG). To evaluate the mSTN effect, we compared motor state and sleep features before and after the neurosurgical procedure, before the programmable pulse generator was switched on. Results: mSTN had beneficial effects on motor state and sleep features. After the surgery, the mean total PDSS score increased from 84.0 +/- 25.2 to 115.2 +/- 16.6 (P < 0.001). PD patients reported longer total sleep time duration, decreased daytime sleepiness, and improvement in RLS symptoms. PSG data showed an increase in total sleep time and sleep efficiency with a decrease in wakefulness after sleep onset and arousal index. No correlation between motor improvements and sleep features modifications was observed after mSTN. Conclusions: mSTN improves sleep quality and ameliorates several sleep complaints, as well as motor symptoms, in advanced PD patients who have undergone STN-DBS. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据