4.3 Article

High sleep duration variability is an independent risk factor for weight gain

期刊

SLEEP AND BREATHING
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 167-172

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11325-012-0665-7

关键词

Variability of sleep duration; Japan; Weight gain; Cohort

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was conducted to evaluate the association between weight gain and variability of sleep duration. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving apparently healthy individuals aged 20 years or older who underwent annual health checkup at the Center for Preventive Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, between 2007 and 2010. The body mass index (BMI) of each participant was measured, and the change in BMI during the study period was calculated. The sleep duration was obtained using a questionnaire that was filled out by participants each year, and the variability in the sleep duration was calculated by dividing the standard deviation (SD) of the sleep duration for 3 years by the square root of the number of data points. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to explore the association between the change in BMI and the variability of the sleep duration, adjusting for age, sex, alcohol consumption, current smoking, baseline sleep duration, past medical history, and level of physical activity. A total of 21,148 participants were included in this study. The mean age (SD) was 51 (12) years, and 10,993 (49.6%) participants were male. The mean baseline BMI was 22.4 (SD 3.2). According to the self-reported data, the mean sleep duration (SD) was 6.2 (1.0) h, and the mean of the SD of sleep duration for each participant was 0.32 (min-max, 0-7). The result of the linear regression analysis showed that greater variability in the sleep duration was independently related to an increase in BMI (beta coefficient = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.01-0.61). The variability of sleep duration is related to body weight gain. Maintaining a constant sleep duration may be recommended for controlling body weight.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据