4.6 Article

Insomnia with Short Sleep Duration and Mortality: The Penn State Cohort

期刊

SLEEP
卷 33, 期 9, 页码 1159-1164

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/33.9.1159

关键词

Insomnia; short sleep duration; mortality; population-based study

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 51931, RO1 40916, RO1 64415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: Because insomnia with objective short sleep duration is associated with increased morbidity, we examined the effects of this insomnia subtype on all-cause mortality. Design: Longitudinal. Setting: Sleep laboratory. Participants: 1,741 men and women randomly selected from Central Pennsylvania. Measurements: Participants were studied in the sleep laboratory and were followed-up for 14 years (men) and 10 years (women). Insomnia was defined by a complaint of insomnia with duration >= 1 year. Normal sleeping was defined as absence of insomnia. Polysomnographic sleep duration was classified into two categories: the normal sleep duration group subjects who slept >= 6 h and the short sleep duration group subjects who slept < 6 h. We adjusted for age, race, education, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, depression, sleep disordered breathing, and sampling weight. Results: The mortality rate was 21% for men and 5% for women. In men, mortality risk was significantly increased in insomniacs who slept less than 6 hours compared to the normal sleep duration, no insomnia group, (OR = 4.00, CI 1.14-13.99) after adjusting for diabetes, hypertension, and other confounders. Furthermore, there was a marginally significant trend (P = 0.15) towards higher mortality risk from insomnia and short sleep in patients with diabetes or hypertension (OR = 7.17, 95% CI 1.41-36.62) than in those without these comorbid conditions (OR = 1.45, 95% CI 0.13-16.14). In women, mortality was not associated with insomnia and short sleep duration. Conclusions: Insomnia with objective short sleep duration in men is associated with increased mortality, a risk that has been underestimated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据