4.2 Article

A Simple Way to Reconstruct a Human 3-D Hypodermis: A Useful Tool for Pharmacological Functionality

期刊

SKIN PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 47-55

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000330904

关键词

Hypodermis equivalent, human 3-D; Mature adipocytes; Adipose-derived stem cells; pref-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Adipose tissue engineering has been hampered by the inability to culture mature adipocytes. Adipose-derived stem cell (ASC) culture opens the way for the preparation of human 3-D hypodermis in large quantities. These models play a role in obesity-related active molecules and slimming agent screening. Moreover, they contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms underpinning obesity. Materials and Methods: Freshly extracted ASC from fat tissue were characterized by flow cytometry for CD73, CD90, CD105, HLA-ABC, CD14 and CD45 markers and by Western blot for pref-1. Their differentiation in mature adipocytes was followed by lipid and adiponectin secretion or by oil red O staining and radioimmunoassay. Neosynthesized extracellular matrix (ECM) of 3-D hypodermis was investigated by immunohistochemistry (collagen type I, V and VI) and transmission electron microscopy. Results: Our results demonstrate that the culture of preadipocytes in proliferation medium for 15 days followed by 16 days of culture in differentiation medium allowed production of the thickest single-layer hypodermis in which preadipocytes and mature adipocytes coexist and synthesize adiponectin and ECM components. Functionality of our 3-D single-layer hypodermis was demonstrated both by a 3.5-fold glycerol production after its stimulation with norepinephrine (adrenergic agonist) and by its slimming after caffeine treatment versus the nontreated 3-D hypodermis. Conclusion: This economic 3-D model, easy to prepare and giving reproducible results after the treatment of actives, is useful for pharmacotoxicological trials as an alternative to animal experimentation. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据