4.7 Article

When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act

期刊

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 215-223

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.045

关键词

England; Marketisation and privatisation of healthcare; For-profit healthcare; National health service; Health and Social Care Act 2012

资金

  1. University of Greenwich
  2. European Research Council [313613]
  3. Effects of Marketization on Societies (TEMS)
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [313613] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Governments world-wide have attempted to use market mechanisms and privatisation to increase the quality and/or reduce the cost of healthcare. England's Health and Social Care Act 2012 is an attempt to promote privatisation through marketisation in the National Health Service (NHS). While the health policy literature tends to assume that privatisation follows from private-sector entry points, we argue that this is more likely if firms expect to make a profit. This paper examines the link between privatisation and marketisation in England drawing on 32 semi-structured interviews with private-sector and public-sector respondents, campaigners, and other experts conducted 6-10 months after the implementation of the 2012 Act. By generating a theoretical framework on the conditions of profitability we seek a better understanding of the conditions under which marketisation leads to privatisation. We find that significant barriers to profit-making remain after the reforms, including a top-down squeeze on prices, uncertainty in market rules, state dominance of funding and provision, and failures to depoliticise the market These factors restrict private-sector involvement by frustrating profit-making. Where profits are made they are through reduced unit costs and high volumes by a longstanding incumbent in a particular market segment This, however, restricts marketisation by reinforcing entry barriers. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据