4.6 Article

γ-GLOBULIN LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED SEPTIC SHOCK

期刊

SHOCK
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 379-385

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181a2c0b2

关键词

Sepsis; immunoglobulins; outcome; free light chains

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) can modulate the host immune response and may improve outcomes in some patients. In this prospective, noninterventional study, we assessed the time-course of gamma-globulin concentrations in 21 patients with septic shock and evaluated the relationship of gamma-globulin concentrations to disease severity and outcome. Six patients (28.5%) died. Sixteen patients (76%) had hypo-gamma-globulinemia at admission: 12 (57%) had low IgG concentrations (<650 mg/dL), 2 had low IgA concentrations (<70 mg/dL), and 9 had low IgM concentrations (<40 mg/dL). Two patients had low concentrations of all three gamma-globulins; these patients both died from refractory shock within 2 days. Patients with low IgG concentrations were indistinguishable at baseline from patients with normal IgG concentrations but had fewer vasopressor-free days (over 28 days) and more frequently developed acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (3/9 vs. 10/12; P = 0.02). All deaths occurred in the patients with low IgG concentrations (6/12 vs. 0/9). There was a variable increase in kappa and lambda free light chains, a marker of gamma-globulin synthesis, over time with no significant difference between low and normal IgG groups. This pilot study indicates that low concentrations of gamma-globulins, especially IgG, are common in patients with community-acquired septic shock and persist over time even when sepsis resolves. Despite similar presentation, patients with hypo-IgG had greater vasopressor requirements, were more likely to develop acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome, and had higher mortality. Patients with low IgG concentrations may represent a logical target group to study the effects of Ig supplementation in septic shock.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据