4.1 Article

Intravaginal Metronidazole/Miconazole for the Treatment of Vaginal Trichomoniasis

期刊

SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
卷 40, 期 9, 页码 710-714

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000431069.38601.d5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Embil Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Trichomonas vaginalis is the causative agent of the most common curable sexually transmitted disease in the world. The infection is treated with a single oral dose of metronidazole or tinidazole, currently the only licensed class of drugs available for this indication; however, both of these antimicrobials are associated with significant gastrointestinal adverse effects, and some individuals are unable to tolerate them because of these adverse effects. Methods: Randomized, dose-ranging pilot study conducted in 2 phases consisting of 20 participants in each phase. In the first phase, participants were randomized to the vaginal suppository (metronidazole 750 mg/miconazole nitrate 200 mg) twice a day for 7 days versus oral metronidazole 2 g single dose. In the second phase, participants randomized to suppository used it once a day for 7 days. Women were reevaluated on days 12 to 15 and 30 to 35. Treatment failures were defined as persistence of trichomonas by wet prep and/or culture. Results: There were no significant differences in cure rates between the vaginal suppositories and oral metronidazole in either phase. The overall efficacy across both follow-up visits was 80% versus 90% for the suppository (2 x /d) versus oral medication arms in phase 1 (P = 1.00) and 78% versus 70% for the suppository (1 x /d) versus oral medication arms in phase 2 (P = 1.00). The results were also nonsignificant when combining results across arm (P = 1.00). Conclusions: High-dose intravaginal metronidazole combined with miconazole offers the possibility of a well-tolerated treatment that avoids the systemic adverse effects of nitroimidazoles for the treatment of trichomoniasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据