4.1 Article

Identification of Novel Genes Associated with Molecular Sex Differentiation in the Embryonic Gonads of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

期刊

SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 214-224

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000228722

关键词

Bioinformatic; Differentiation; Embryo; Fish; Gonad; Microarray; Sex; Transgenic trout

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20116006] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular pathways in embryonic vertebrates leading to gonad formation in each sex are incompletely understood. The purpose of this study was to identify novel genes that could be associated with sex-specific gonadal differentiation in a fish, the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). This study was facilitated by a custom microarray based on 7,671 genes derived from embryonic rainbow trout gonad cDNA libraries and public databases. Gonad samples for total RNA isolation were obtained from pvasa-green fluorescent protein (pvasa-GFP) transgenic rainbow between 300 and 700 degree-days of development post-fertilization. The transgenic fish permitted the collection of gonads from embryonic rainbow trout during the period of molecular sex differentiation in advance of any morphologically distinguishable characteristics of sex. A bioinformatic method was used with the microarray data that looked for strong associations in gene expression patterns between known sex differentiation genes (the target genes) and novel genes (the target-associated genes) previously not allied with sex differentiation in fishes. The expression patterns of representative target genes from both sexes and their target-associated genes were independently confirmed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction to support the validity of the bioinformatic method employed. Numerous novel genes were identified in the gonads of embryonic female and male rainbow trout that could be involved in sex-specific differentiation pathways in this fish. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据