4.7 Article

Surfactant and oxidant enhanced electrokinetic remediation of a PCBs polluted soil

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 106-113

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.12.035

关键词

Polychlorinated biphenyls; Soil remediation; Electrokinetics; Persulfate; Igepal CA-720; Zero-valent iron

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21177135, 21077111]
  2. International Research Staff Exchange Scheme [FP7-PEOPLE-IRSES-2010-269289-ELECTROACROSS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To remediate polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) polluted soils is a big challenge due to the high toxicity, persistence and hydrophobicity of PCBs. Traditional remediation techniques such as landfilling, incineration, heat adsorption and biodegradation have their different application conditions, while electrokinetics (EM) is an alternative choice to remediate PCBs polluted soils in low permeable soil. In this study, a PCBs polluted soil sampled from a landfill was selected as a typical soil, and Igepal CA-720 and persulfate were respectively selected as surfactant and oxidant for enhanced EK remediation of this soil. Batch experiments showed that 2% of Igepal CA-720 and 20% of persulfate were the optimum dosage for PCBs extraction and oxidation from the polluted soil. During the EM, Igepal CA-720 and persulfate were added in the anode and cathode reservoirs, respectively, and zero-valent iron was used as the activator of persulfate. The results showed that Igepal CA-720 partially solubilized soil PCBs and caused PCBs migration towards cathode, while persulfate was successfully delivered from cathode towards anode by ER. The highest degradation rate of PCBs was 38.0% in the treatment using Igepal CA-720 and persulfate in the absence of activator, which is ascribed that zero-valent iron, added in the cathode reservoir, consumed most of persulfate and inhibited its transport into the cell. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据