4.7 Article

Visible-light-driven photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic debromination of BDE-47 on a macroporous silicon/graphene heterostructure

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 154-160

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.06.007

关键词

Silicon; Graphene; Heterostructure; Debromination; Visible light

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB936002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20837001, 21007007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macroporous silicon/graphene (MPSi/Gr) heterostructure was fabricated by electrophoresis depositing Gr sheets on the surface of MPSi and then annealing the samples to improve adhesion and electrochemical property. In the photoelectrochemical measurements, MPSi/Gr heterostructure displayed stable and high photocurrent compared with MPSi. The stability profits from protection of Cr layer, and the enhancement of photocurrent is ascribed to effective photogenerated charge separation of MPSi/Gr heterostructure. The results of photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic debromination of BDE-47 showed MPSi/Gr possesses excellent photocatalytic capability, and this capability can be enhanced by applying a bias potential. The kinetic constant of MPSi/Gr (1.13 h(-1)) heterostructure in photoelectrocatalytic process was five times as much as that of MPSi/carbon film heterostructure (0.22 h(-1)), indicating Cr, as a charge collector which can promote separation and transfer of photogenerated carries, is superior to other carbon materials for building heterostructures. The majority (87.1%) of debromination was induced by visible light which was confirmed by comparing reaction efficiency under xenon lamp irradiation to that under the same lamp irradiation via a 422 nm filter. According to the results of photocatalytic debromination experiments with O-2 or N-2 bubbling, debromination mechanism of BDE-47 was proposed as a reductive debromination by photogenerated electrons. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据