4.7 Article

Integration of nanofiltration, UV photolysis, and advanced oxidation processes for the removal of hormones from surface water sources

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 89-96

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.04.013

关键词

Hormones; Surface water; Nanofiltration; Low pressure direct photolysis; Advanced oxidation processes

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [BPD/26990/2006, PEst-OE/EQB/LA0004/2011]
  2. EEA Financial Mechanism
  3. Empresa Portuguesa das Aguas Livres (EPAL)
  4. Municipio de Almada
  5. IBET [PT0012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the integration of nanofiltration with direct and indirect UV photolysis for drinking water treatment in order to guarantee effective removal of different hormones with endocrine disruption capabilities - mestranol, octylphenol, nonylphenol, progesterone, estrone, estriol, 17 alpha-ethynylestradiol, and beta-estradiol - from real surface water matrices. The integration of nanofiltration previously to low pressure ultraviolet direct or indirect photolysis reduces the level of turbidity as well as the micropollutant contamination levels in drinking water supplies, due to rejection based on size exclusion and molecular interactions with the nanofiltration membrane surface. The use of nanofiltration in the treatment of surface waters spiked with different hormones allowed their rejection at levels higher than 71% for all target hormones except estriol. Low pressure indirect photolysis with 100 mg/L of hydrogen peroxide was also efficient to degrade the selected hormones with percent degradations higher than 74% achieved for all the hormones, except nonylphenol (55%). The integrated process (nanofiltration followed by direct photolysis or indirect photolysis) is extremely efficient to remove all the target hormones from a real surface water matrix and guarantees the production of water with extremely high chemical quality. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据