4.7 Article

Use of surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for studying fouling on nanofiltration membrane

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 7-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.05.019

关键词

Raman spectroscopy; Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy; Nanofiltration membrane; Membrane fouling

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane fouling is a key constraint for the widespread application of membrane-based technologies in water and wastewater treatment because it reduces the production volume of water, thereby increasing operating and maintenance costs. Characterization of membrane materials and foulant layers is crucial for an accurate understanding of fouling processes. This study used surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) and normal Raman spectroscopy as a novel technique to examine fouling caused by naturally occurring organics on a polymeric nanofiltration (NF) membrane, which is used for the treatment of drinking water. The results from this study suggest that normal Raman spectroscopy is useful for characterization of polyamide NF membranes used in drinking water treatment, but is not sensitive enough to resolve the foulant materials present on the membrane surface. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of virgin and used membrane suggests significant membrane fouling. The observed SERS peak of fouled membrane at wavenumber 1543 cm(-1) suggests the presence of protein and those at 1444, 1305, and 1239 cm(-1) indicate the possible presence of carbohydrate on the membrane surface. These results demonstrate that SERS has the potential for identification of functional groups of organics involved in NF membrane fouling in water treatment that could lead to improved strategies for membrane fouling reduction. The use of SERS for possible foulant identification offers a rapid, cost effective and portable tool for on-site analysis of membrane surfaces. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据