4.7 Article

Processing-microstructure-property correlations of gas sensors based on ZnO nanotetrapods

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 509-517

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.02.012

关键词

T-ZnO; Morphological evolution; Sensing performance; Sintering temperature

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB939702, 2009CB939705]
  2. Nature Science Foundation of China [50772040, 50927201]
  3. Analytic Testing Center of HUST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After gas sensors based on ZnO nanotetrapods (T-ZnO) were processed by sintering at different temperatures from 350 to 850 degrees C, a strong correlation was interestingly found among the sintering processing, material microstructure and gas-sensing properties. With increasing sintering temperature from 350 to 750 degrees C, the feet and cross of T-ZnO became gradually shorter and bigger, respectively. And subsequently tetrahedron-shaped ZnO nanoparticles were produced instead of T-ZnO at 850 degrees C. The morphological evolution was explained by a new physical model involving Thomson effect, leading to a decrease in the specific surface area. In addition, the contact between feet got better and then became poorer. Meanwhile, surface defects of T-ZnO were also altered: zinc interstitial (Zn-i(center dot center dot)) was decreased in its amount while oxygen vacancy (V-O(x)) showed an inverse trend as sintering temperature increased. Moreover, the best gas-sensing performance toward formaldehyde and methanol was obtained after sintering at 450 degrees C. This was mainly attributed to the synergetic effect between the best grain contact (meaning that more T-ZnO can make contributions to the sensor response) and more zinc interstitial as well as larger specific surface area (supplying more chemisorbed oxygen). Our work could offer important guidance for the process selection and material design to develop nanostructure-based sensors. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据