4.6 Article

A Data Quality Control Method for Seafloor Observatories: The Application of Observed Time Series Data in the East China Sea

期刊

SENSORS
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s18082628

关键词

seafloor observatory; data quality control; ARIMA; outlier detection; data interpolation

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai [15DZ1207104, 15DZ1203100]
  2. Shanghai Oceanic Administration [Huhaike 2016-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the construction and deployment of seafloor observatories around the world, massive amounts of oceanographic measurement data were gathered and transmitted to data centers. The increase in the amount of observed data not only provides support for marine scientific research but also raises the requirements for data quality control, as scientists must ensure that their research outcomes come from high-quality data. In this paper, we first analyzed and defined data quality problems occurring in the East China Sea Seafloor Observatory System (ECSSOS). We then proposed a method to detect and repair the data quality problems of seafloor observatories. Incorporating data statistics and expert knowledge from domain specialists, the proposed method consists of three parts: a general pretest to preprocess data and provide a router for further processing, data outlier detection methods to label suspect data points, and a data interpolation method to fill up missing and suspect data. The autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was improved and applied to seafloor observatory data quality control by using a sliding window and cleaning the input modeling data. Furthermore, a quality control flag system was also proposed and applied to describe data quality control results and processing procedure information. The real observed data in ECSSOS were used to implement and test the proposed method. The results demonstrated that the proposed method performed effectively at detecting and repairing data quality problems for seafloor observatory data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据