4.3 Article

Local binary patterns versus signal processing texture analysis: a study from a performance evaluation perspective

期刊

SENSOR REVIEW
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 149-162

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/02602281211209446

关键词

Signal processing; Pattern recognition; Texture classification; Local binary patterns; Rotational invariance; Gabor filters; Isotropic filters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review and provide a detailed performance evaluation of a number of texture descriptors that analyse texture at micro-level such as local binary patterns (LBP) and a number of standard filtering techniques that sample the texture information using either a bank of isotropic filters or Gabor filters. Design/methodology/approach - The experimental tests were conducted on standard databases where the classification results are obtained for single and multiple texture orientations. The authors also analysed the performance of standard filtering texture analysis techniques (such as those based of LM and MR8 filter banks) when applied to the classification of texture images contained in standard Outex and Brodatz databases. Findings - The most important finding resulting from this study is that although the LBP/C and the multi-channel Gabor filtering techniques approach texture analysis from a different theoretical perspective, in this paper the authors have experimentally demonstrated that they share some common properties in regard to the way they sample the macro and micro properties of the texture. Practical implications - Texture is a fundamental property of digital images and the development of robust image descriptors plays a crucial role in the process of image segmentation and scene understanding. Originality/value - This paper contrast, from a practical and theoretical standpoint, the LBP and representative multi-channel texture analysis approaches and a substantial number of experimental results were provided to evaluate their performance when applied to standard texture databases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据