4.4 Article

Bernard-Soulier Syndrome: An Update

期刊

SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 656-662

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1353390

关键词

Bernard-Soulier syndrome; bleeding disorders; glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex; platelets; von Willebrand factor

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Monash University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bernard-Soulier syndrome (BSS) is a rare inherited platelet bleeding disorder characterized by low platelet count and abnormally large platelets (macrothrombocytopenia). Platelets from BSS patients are typically defective in surface expression of glycoprotein (GP)Ib-IX-V, a platelet-specific adhesion-signaling complex, composed of GPIb disulfide linked to GPIb, and noncovalently associated with GPIX and GPV. The major ligand-binding subunit, GPIb, binds the adhesive ligands von Willebrand factor (VWF) or thrombospondin, counterreceptors on activated endothelial cells (P-selectin) or activated leukocytes (integrin (M2)), and coagulation factors (thrombin, factors XI and XII, high-molecular-weight kininogen). The cytoplasmic domain of GPIb-IX-V interacts with the cytoskeletal protein, filamin-A via a binding site within the GPIb cytoplasmic tail, and with structural-signaling proteins including calmodulin, 14-3-3 and the p85 subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. GPIb is physically/functionally co-associated on the platelet surface with the major platelet collagen receptor, GPVI. As such, it is easy to see how genetic defects impacting GPIb-IX-V expression or function can have significant consequences on normal platelet size, adhesion to VWF/collagen and/or stable thrombus formation, and why BSS is often associated with clinical bleeding. Furthermore, the rarity, multiple genetic causes, and variable clinical phenotype of BSS can complicate routine diagnosis. Here, we discuss how studies of BSS have contributed to platelet biology and recent studies to improve diagnosis and treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据