4.2 Review

Immunosuppression for Connective Tissue Disease-Related Pulmonary Disease

期刊

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1371531

关键词

polymyositis; interstitial lung disease; therapy; cyclophosphamide; systemic sclerosis; pulmonary vasculitis; rituximab

资金

  1. GSK
  2. Novartis
  3. Actelion
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. InterMune
  6. Lanthio
  7. Takeda
  8. Sanofi-Aventis
  9. UCB
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. Roche
  12. Celgene
  13. National Institute for Health Research [11/116/03] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With improvements in the systemic treatment of the various connective tissue diseases (CTDs) the pulmonary complications of these conditions are now, for many patients, the major cause of morbidity and impaired quality of life. Furthermore, at least in scleroderma, pulmonary disease has become the leading cause of death for this patient group. Although, the pathogenesis of CTD-related pulmonary disease is poorly understood there is an assumption that it arises as a sequelae of immune-mediated injury to the lung. As a result, immunosuppressant agents form the mainstay of treatment for pulmonary disease occurring in the context of CTD. There is, however, a paucity of clinical trial data available to inform treatment decisions across the spectrum of CTD-related pulmonary disease. The best available evidence has been generated in scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease. Therefore, treatment decisions are informed by registry data, case series, and individual case reports. With this in mind, corticosteroids together with azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil are widely used for the management of mild disease or as a maintenance therapy, while cyclophosphamide and rituximab have emerged as treatments for refractory or rapidly progressive disease. This article examines the data underpinning the use of different immunosuppressants in CTD-associated pulmonary disease while highlighting limitations in the existing knowledge base and identifying questions for future clinical study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据