4.5 Review

Functional crosstalk of PGC-1 coactivators and inflammation in skeletal muscle pathophysiology

期刊

SEMINARS IN IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 27-53

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00281-013-0406-4

关键词

Skeletal muscle; Metabolism; Metabolic disorders; Inflammation; PGC-1; NF-kappa B; Macrophages

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. Muscular Dystrophy Association USA (MDA)
  3. SwissLife 'Jubilaumsstiftung fur Volksgesundheit und medizinische Forschung'
  4. Swiss Society for Research on Muscle Diseases (SSEM)
  5. Swiss Diabetes Association
  6. Roche Research Foundation
  7. United Mitochondrial Disease Foundation (UMDF)
  8. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies (AFM)
  9. Gebert-Ruf Foundation Rare Diseases Program
  10. University of Basel
  11. Biozentrum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skeletal muscle is an organ involved in whole body movement and energy metabolism with the ability to dynamically adapt to different states of (dis-)use. At a molecular level, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivators 1 (PGC-1s) are important mediators of oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscle and in other organs. Musculoskeletal disorders as well as obesity and its sequelae are associated with PGC-1 dysregulation in muscle with a concomitant local or systemic inflammatory reaction. In this review, we outline the function of PGC-1 coactivators in physiological and pathological conditions as well as the complex interplay of metabolic dysregulation and inflammation in obesity with special focus on skeletal muscle. We further put forward the hypothesis that, in this tissue, oxidative metabolism and inflammatory processes mutually antagonize each other. The nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) pathway thereby plays a key role in linking metabolic and inflammatory programs in muscle cells. We conclude this review with a perspective about the consequences of such a negative crosstalk on the immune system and the possibilities this opens for clinical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据