4.2 Article

Progesterone to prevent spontaneous preterm birth

期刊

SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 15-26

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2013.10.004

关键词

Cervical cerclage; Cervical length; Cervical ultrasound; Short cervix; Ultrasound; Vaginal progesterone

资金

  1. Perinatology Research Branch
  2. Division of Intramural Research
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health
  4. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH)
  5. NICHD, NIH [HHSN275201300006C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, and its prevention is an important healthcare priority. Preterm parturition is one of the 'great obstetrical syndromes' and is caused by multiple etiologies. One of the mechanisms of disease is the untimely decline in progesterone action, which can present as a clinically silent sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester. The detection of a short cervix in the midtrimester is a powerful risk factor for preterm delivery. Vaginal progesterone can reduce the rate of preterm delivery by 45% and the rate of neonatal morbidity (admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, respiratory distress syndrome, need for mechanical ventilation, etc.). To prevent one case of spontaneous preterm birth <33 weeks of gestation, 11 patients with a short cervix would need to be treated (based on an individual patient meta-analysis). Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of spontaneous preterm birth in women with a short cervix, both with and without a prior history of preterm birth. In patients with a prior history of preterm birth, vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm delivery. 17 alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone caproate has not been shown to be effective in reducing the rate of spontaneous preterm birth in women with a short cervix. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据