4.6 Article

Diagenetic processes in carbonate mound sediments at the south-west Rockall Trough margin

期刊

SEDIMENTOLOGY
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 912-931

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2009.01125.x

关键词

Carbonate diagenesis; carbonate mound; cold watercorals; lithification; Rockall Trough

类别

资金

  1. European Science Foundation (ESF)/Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. NWO through NEBROC (Netherlands-Bremen Cooperation in Oceanography) [800.08.290]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cold water coral covered carbonate mounds at the south-west margin of the Rockall Trough form ridges several kilometres long and up to 380 m high. Piston cores obtained at three mound crests reveal the complex internal structure of the mound build up, with alternating unlithified coral-dominated intervals and lithified intervals. The most recent lithified interval is covered by corals embedded in a fine-grained matrix, comprising ca 11 000 years of continuous mound evolution. Before this time 230Th/U dating shows the presence of several hiatuses in mound build-up. Aragonitic coral material is absent or only present as mouldic porosity in the lithified intervals and coccoliths display widespread overgrowth. Downcore X-ray fluorescence scanning, computer tomography scan images and petrographic observations indicate different degrees of diagenetic alteration. The upper boundary of the most recent lithified interval shows some erosional features, but petrographic observations indicate that initial lithification of the sediments is not related to this erosive event or to long-term non-sedimentation, but to earlier sub-surface diagenesis. Organic matter oxidation and the subsequent lowering of the saturation state of the carbonate system drives dissolution of the unstable aragonitic coral skeletons. Depending on the openness of the system, this can lead to precipitation of a more stable low-magnesium carbonate. A model is presented describing the sedimentary and diagenetic processes leading to the formation of lithified intervals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据