4.7 Article

Discriminative Learning for Automatic Staging of Placental Maturity via Multi-layer Fisher Vector

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep12818

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61402296, 61101026, 61372006, 81270707, 61427806]
  2. 48th Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2013040014448]
  4. Shenzhen Key Basic Research Project [JCYJ20140414155132004, JCYJ20130329105033277, JCYJ20140509172609164]
  5. Shenzhen-Hong Kong Innovation Circle Funding Program [JSE201109150013A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, placental maturity is performed using subjective evaluation, which can be unreliable as it is highly dependent on the observations and experiences of clinicians. To address this problem, this paper proposes a method to automatically stage placenta maturity from B-mode ultrasound (US) images based on dense sampling and novel feature descriptors. Specifically, our proposed method first densely extracts features with a regular grid based on dense sampling instead of a few unreliable interest points. Followed by, these features are clustered using generative Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to obtain high order statistics of the features. The clustering representatives (i.e., cluster means) are encoded by Fisher vector (FV) for staging accuracy enhancement. Differing from the previous studies, a multi-layer FV is investigated to exploit the spatial information rather than the single layer FV. Experimental results show that the proposed method with the dense FV has achieved an area under the receiver of characteristics (AUC) of 96.77%, sensitivity and specificity of 98.04% and 93.75% for the placental maturity staging, respectively. Our experimental results also demonstrate that the dense feature outperforms the traditional sparse feature for placental maturity staging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据