4.4 Article

Theoretical analysis and experimental research on toggle-brace-damper system considering different installation modes

期刊

SCIENTIA IRANICA
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 1379-1390

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scient.2012.10.011

关键词

Toggle-brace-damper; Energy dissipation; Seismic; Viscous damper

资金

  1. Foundation of Basic Research Program of the State Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [SLDRCE10-D-01]
  2. Foundation of Shanghai Engineering Technical Research Centre [10DZ2252000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The toggle-brace-damper system has been proven to be the most effective system for the energy dissipation of stiff structures. However, the expected effect of the toggle-brace-damper system depends largely on its configuration, the use of steel braces and the installation mode. The existing design methods of toggle-brace-damper systems may be further improved. The analysis of different installation modes and experiments involving toggle-brace-damper systems are conducted to improve understanding of the influence of key factors and to provide design guidance. For toggle-brace-damper system tests, a vertical brace is installed in a steel frame to prevent out-of-plane instability. The calculation formulas for an upper toggle-brace-damper system and other configuration systems with consideration of the influence of brace deformation are studied in the paper. Test results show that the upper toggle-brace-damper system has the largest magnification factor, which is consistent with the theoretical analyses. The brace deformation and installation error cannot be ignored in the design of a toggle-brace-damper system. Installation error can also lead to out-of-plane instability of a toggle-brace-damper system. Moreover, the experimental results show that the magnification factor changes with loading and is different when force is applied in the push and pull directions. (C) 2012 Sharif University of Technology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据