4.5 Article

JNK3 Couples the Neuronal Stress Response to Inhibition of Secretory Trafficking

期刊

SCIENCE SIGNALING
卷 6, 期 283, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2003727

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secretory trafficking through the Golgi complex is critical for neuronal development, function, and stress response. Altered secretion is associated with the pathogenesis of various neurological diseases. We found that c-Jun amino-terminal kinase 3 (JNK3) inhibited secretory trafficking by promoting the depletion of phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI4P) in the Golgi complex of COS7 cells and primary rat neurons. Exposure of cultured primary rat neurons to excitotoxic concentrations of NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate), an agonist of a class of ionotropic glutamate receptors, or overexpression of zD17 (a palmitoyl transferase) resulted in JNK3 palmitoylation and association with the Golgi complex. Analysis of mutant constructs of JNK3 indicated that Golgi association was independent of its kinase activity but depended on its palmitoylation. The association of JNK3 with the Golgi in cultured neurons decreased the secretory trafficking of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor subunit GluR1 (glutamate receptor subunit 1), a component of ionotropic glutamate receptors found at glutamatergic synapses. Palmitoylated JNK3 bound to the phosphatase Sac1, increasing its abundance at the Golgi and thereby decreasing the abundance of PI4P, a lipid necessary for post-Golgi trafficking. Disrupting the JNK3-Sac1 interaction with two synthetic peptides prevented the loss of surface GluR1 and preserved synaptic integrity in cultured neurons exposed to NMDA. Together, our results suggest that JNK3 participates in an adaptive response to neuronal hyperexcitation by impeding secretory trafficking at the Golgi complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据