4.7 Article

Factors driving epilithic algal colonization in show caves and new insights into combating biofilm development with UV-C treatments

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 484, 期 -, 页码 43-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.043

关键词

Epilithic algae; Biofilms; Cave; Growth-influencing factors; Colorimetric measurements; UV-C treatment

资金

  1. Ministere de la Culture et de la Communication
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CNRS
  3. Region de Franche-Comte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proliferation of epilithic algae that form biofilms in subterranean environments, such as show caves, is a major problem for conservators. In an effort to reduce the use of chemical cleansers when addressing this problem, we proposed investigating the effects of UV-C on combating algal biofilm expansion in a cave located in northeastern France (Moidons Cave). First, the biofilms and cavity were studied in terms of their algal growth-influencing factors to understand the dynamics of colonization in these very harsh environments. Next, colorimetric measurements were used both to diagnose the initial colonization state and monitor the UV-C-treated biofilms for several months after irradiation. The results indicated that passive dispersal vectors of the viable spores and cells were the primary factors involved in the cave's algae repartition. The illumination time during visits appeared to be responsible for greater colonization in some parts of the cave. We also showed that colorimetric measurements could be used for the detection of both thin and thick biofilms, regardless of the type of colonized surface. Finally, our results showed that UV-C treatment led to bleaching of the treated biofilm due to chlorophyll degradation even one year after UV-C treatment. However, a re-colonization phenomenon was colorimetrically and visually detected 16 months later, suggesting that the colonization dynamics had not been fully halted. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据