4.7 Article

Fractionation and health risks of atmospheric particle-bound As and heavy metals in summer and winter

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 493, 期 -, 页码 487-494

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.017

关键词

Aerosol; Seasonal variation; Optimized BCR sequential procedure; Inhalation exposure; Non-carcinogenic risk

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [41030746, 21275069]
  2. Natural Science Fund of Jiangsu Province [BK20131268]
  3. Special Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, Nanjing University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elemental chemical speciation in atmospheric particles determining their bioavailability and toxicity is an implication for human health assessment. Total suspended particulates (TSP) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in summer and winter (Nanjing, China) were therefore collected for assessing the fractionation and human health risks associated with As and heavy metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Cr, Cd and Mn). Elements' contents and their enrichment factors in TSP and PM2.5 varied greatly with the season. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis confirmed the seasonal variation of these elements. Based on the optimized Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) sequential extraction procedure, the elemental distribution in TSP and PM2.5 differs dramatically. Labile and bioavailable fractions of Zn, Pb, As and Cu in atmospheric particles were more than 60%. Based on the bioavailable fractions, the carcinogenic risks are mainly from the ingestion of Pb in PM2.5. For non-carcinogenic risk, accumulative multi-elements via inhalation and/or ingestion exposure can impact both children and adults, while single element ingestion such as As, Pb and Co may pose risks to children. More attention should be paid to alleviate non-carcinogenic health risks posed by particle bound toxic elements via ingestion and inhalation exposure. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据