4.7 Article

Polybrominated biphenyl ethers in breast milk and infant formula from Shanghai, China: Temporal trends, daily intake, and risk assessment

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 497, 期 -, 页码 508-515

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.034

关键词

Daily intake; Human milk; Infant formula; Polybrominated biphenyl ethers; Risk assessment

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21277086, 21277087]
  2. Key Discipline Construction Project of Shanghai Municipal Public Health [12GWZX0401]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team in University [IRT13078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the temporal trend of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in breast milk and assess the risks to breast- and formula-fed infants, breast milk and infant formula samples were collected from Shanghai, China. The PBDE concentrations decreased from 14.8 to 4.85 pmol/g lipid weight during 2006-2012, with a rate of decrease by half approximately every four years. Although there were no significant correlations between the total PBDEs in breast milk and age, parity, and pre-pregnant BMI of mothers, there were significant differences between primiparous and multiparous mothers for tri- to hepta-BDEs. PBDEs in breast milk were much higher than those in infant formula (equivalent to 91.9 vs. 5.25 pg/mL). Among the different brand infant formulas, there were no significant differences in their PBDE concentrations, The estimated daily intake of PBDEs by breast- and formula-fed infants suggested that breast-fed infants are exposed to much more PBDEs than formula-fed ones (12.9 vs. 0.72 ng/kg-bw/day). However, the hazard quotient values were much smaller than one, indicating that the ingested PBDEs did not exert obvious adverse effects on both breast- and formula-fed infants considering non-carcinogenic effect end-point. This is the first report on temporal trend of PBDEs in breast milk from China. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据