4.7 Article

A state-wide survey in Oregon (USA) of trace metals and organic chemicals in municipal effluent

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 417, 期 -, 页码 263-272

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.028

关键词

Municipal effluent; Wastewater; Pesticides; Methylmercury; PBDE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oregon's Senate Bill 737, enacted in 2007, required the state's 52 largest municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) and water pollution control facilities (WPCF) to collect effluent samples in 2010 and analyze them for persistent organic pollutants. These facilities are located state-wide and represent a variety of treatment types, service population sizes, geographic areas, and flow conditions. Of the 406 chemicals ultimately analyzed, 114 were detected above the level of quantification (LOQ) in at least one sample. Few persistent pollutants were found possibly because of their diversion from effluent via sorption to sludge (solids phase) or high LOQs for certain chemicals. Several pesticides, as well as benzene and phenol degradation products, all previously unreported in effluent, were detected. Ten polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) congeners were present at low concentrations in <= 10 samples, while polychlorinated naphthalenes and dioxins/furans were not detected at all. Twenty-one polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) congeners were found, nine of which have been reported in Osprey eggs in Oregon and Washington. Methylmercury was present in 65% of samples, with average and maximum concentrations of 0.18 and 1.36 ng/L, respectively. Although they are generally assumed to be innocuous by-products of sewage treatment, additional research is needed on potential impacts to aquatic ecosystems of high loadings of coprostanol and cholesterol. These results suggest that effluent, rather than just receiving waters, should itself be analyzed for a wide range of contaminants in order to understand how upstream sources, conveyed through WWTPs and WPCFs, could be impacting aquatic ecosystems. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据