4.7 Article

Identification of phosphorus export from low-runoff yielding areas using combined application of high frequency water quality data and MODHMS modelling

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 426, 期 -, 页码 264-271

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.021

关键词

Phosphorus transfer; Groundwater discharge; Overland flow; Groundwater-surface water interaction; Hysteresis

资金

  1. Western Australian Government
  2. Water Corporation of Western Australia
  3. CSIRO's Water for a Healthy Country Flagship through the Urban Water and Healthy Water Ecosystems themes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In basins combining fiat-sandy valleys and hilly-bedrock sub-catchments, the assessment of nutrient (phosphorus) exports from low-runoff yielding environments is difficult. To overcome this issue hydrological modelling and high frequency phosphorus measurements were simultaneously employed. A coupled surface water-groundwater interaction model (MODHMS) was used to determine runoff from the low-runoff yielding part of the catchment. The modelling results indicated that the lower catchment contributed less than 10% of annual catchment discharge over a number of weeks during mid-winter. High frequency phosphorus (P) measurements showed a threefold increase in P concentration during this period in 2008, which lasted for 3 weeks. Concentration-discharge analysis suggested that the increase in P concentration was associated with runoff generation processes in the low-runoff yielding sub-catchment. It was estimated that this area contributed 32% of the annual P load though only 2% of total annual discharge in 2008. Both runoff and P contributions occurred during the period when the water table rose to the surface causing inundation. It was shown that the P concentrations in discharge from the low-runoff yielding sub-catchment were similar to those observed in the shallow groundwater layers. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据