4.7 Article

Multiple pb sources in marine sediments near the Australian Antarctic Station, Casey

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 389, 期 2-3, 页码 466-474

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.09.022

关键词

Casey Station; Wilkes Station; Antarctica; Pb isotope ratios; magnetic sector ICP-MS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An extensive Pb isotope ratio survey of similar to 100 marine sediment samples from near Casey Station, East Antarctica has been undertaken. Sediment surface grabs and cores were collected over nine years between 1997-2006 and, following HF total digestion, were analysed by magnetic sector ICP-MS. Fifty-two reference samples ([Pb] range 5-26 mg kg(-1)) from 6 non-impacted locations displayed a broad range of Pb isotope ratios representative of the natural background geology of the region (Pb-208/Pb-204 ratios of 37.5-40; Pb-206/Pb-204 ratios of 17-19). Potentially impacted sediments from Brown Bay (n=27, [Pb] range 18-215 mg kg-1), adjacent to the current and former Australian Stations at Casey (and the associated Thala Valley tip site) showed contamination by Pb characteristic of Broken Hill and Mt Isa Australian deposits (Pb-208/Pb-204 and Pb-206/Pb-204 values of 35.5-36 and 16.0-16.1, respectively). The nearby abandoned Wilkes Station was previously manned by both US (1957-59) and Australian (1959-69) expeditioners. Adjacentmarine sediment samples (n=24, [Pb] range 1340 mg kg(-1)) displayed Pb isotopic signatures suggesting anthropogenic input from multiple sources. on a three-isotope diagram Wilkes sediments were found to display Pb ratios lying intermediate between Missouri (US), Broken Hill/Mt Isa (Australia)/Idaho (US), and natural geogenic Pb end members. Discarded Pb batteries, paint samples and fuel spills were all considered in this work as possible point sources of Pb contamination to the local environment. Batteries are thought to be the dominant source. Crown Copyright (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据