4.7 Article

The role of maize root size in phosphorus uptake and productivity of maize/faba bean and maize/wheat intercropping systems

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
卷 55, 期 11, 页码 993-1001

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-012-4396-6

关键词

faba bean; intercropping; maize; phosphorus uptake; root growth; wheat

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31121062, 31071852]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB11860]
  3. Special Fund for the Agricultural Profession [201103003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interspecific root/rhizosphere interactions affect phosphorus (P) uptake and the productivity of maize/faba bean and maize/wheat intercropping systems. The aim of these experiments was to determine whether manipulation of maize root growth could improve the productivity of the two intercropping systems. Two near isogenic maize hybrids (the larger-rooted T149 and smaller-rooted T222) were intercropped with faba bean and wheat, under conditions of high- and low-P availability. The larger-rooted T149 showed greater competitive ability than the smaller-rooted T222 in both maize/faba bean and maize/wheat intercropping systems. The higher competitive ability of T149 improved the productivity of the maize/faba bean intercropping system in P-sufficient conditions. In maize/wheat intercropping systems, root growth, shoot biomass, and P uptake of maize were inhibited by wheat, regardless of the P-supply. Compared with T222, the larger-rooted T149 suffered less in the intercropping systems. The total biomass of the maize/wheat intercropping system was higher for wheat/T149 than for wheat/T222 under low-P conditions. These data suggested that genetic improvement of maize root size could enhance maize growth and its ability to compete for P resources in maize/faba bean and maize/wheat intercropping systems. In addition, depending on the P availability, larger maize roots could increase the productivity of intercropping systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据