4.6 Article

Pyrite nanotube array films as an efficient photocatalyst for degradation of methylene blue and phenol

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 77, 页码 62724-62731

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra07434g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1261120]
  2. Post-Doctoral Foundation of China [2013M530930]
  3. Scientific Foundation of Educational Department of Liaoning Province [L2012084]
  4. Project of Ministry of Education of Basic Scientific Research [N130402001]
  5. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum Beijing [2462014YJRC011]
  6. Open fund from State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiaotong University [mmckf-14-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pyrite crystal is used as a potential catalyst for the degradation of pollutants or removing waste gas in environmental engineering. However, the traditional pyrite synthetic process could lead to intermediate phases during formation of pyrite, such as FeS or Fe1-xS, hurting the purity of the products. In this study, pure FeS2 nanotubes with a stoichiometric ratio were fabricated by vulcanizing the precursor nanotubes. The photocatalytic activity of nanotubes was investigated via decomposing methylene blue and phenol. The results indicated that the oxidation of pyrite affected the photocatalytic activity of pyrite nanotubes slightly. Comparing with the pyrite piled microparticle coating and the hematite nanotube coating, the visible light driven catalytic activity of the pyrite nanotube coating was derived from increased production of hydroxyl radicals. The topography of the nanotube array contributed to the generation of the photoinduced hole(+) and separation of the e(-)/hole(+) pairs, eventually enhanced photocatalysis performance. In addition, Fe2O3 nanotubes can decompose MB effectively, however, hardly degrade phenol. This work offers insight to develop transition metal based semiconductor photocatalysts for environmental and energy utilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据