4.8 Article

When Are Two Heads Better than One and Why?

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 336, 期 6079, 页码 360-362

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1216549

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max Wertheimer Minerva Center for Cognitive Processes and Human Performance, University of Haifa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recent study, using a perceptual task, indicated that two heads were better than one provided that the members could communicate freely, presumably sharing their confidence in their judgments. Capitalizing on recent work on subjective confidence, I replicated this effect in the absence of any dyadic interaction by selecting on each trial the decision of the more confident member of a virtual dyad. However, because subjective confidence monitors the consensuality rather than the accuracy of a decision, when most participants were in error, reliance on the more confident member yielded worse decisions than those of the better individual. Assuming that for each issue group decisions are dominated by the more confident member, these results help specify when groups will be more or less accurate than individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据