4.4 Article

Reduced dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex in treatment resistant schizophrenia

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 148, 期 1-3, 页码 81-86

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.05.002

关键词

Cortical thickness; Schizophrenia; Treatment resistant; Refractory; MRI

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2011/50740-5]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/50740-5] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Treatment resistance affects up to one third of patients with schizophrenia (SCZ). A better understanding of its biological underlying processes could improve treatment. The aim of this study was to compare cortical thickness between non-resistant SCZ (NR-SCZ), treatment-resistant SCZ (TR-SCZ) patients and healthy controls (HC). Methodology: Structural MRI scans were obtained from 3 groups of individuals: 61 treatment resistant SCZ individuals, 67 non-resistant SCZ and 80 healthy controls. Images were analyzed using cortical surface modelling (implemented in freesurfer package) to identify group differences in cortical thickness. Statistical significant differences were identified using Monte-Carlo simulation method with a corrected p-cluster < 0.01. Results: Patients in the TR-SCZ group showed a widespread reduction in cortical thickness in frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital regions bilaterally. NR-SCZ group had reduced cortex in two regions (left superior frontal cortex and left caudal middle frontal cortex). TR-SCZ group also showed decreased thickness in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) when compared with patients from NR-SCZ group. Conclusions: The reduction in cortical thickness in DLPFC indicates a more severe form of the disease or a specific finding for this group. Alterations in this region should be explored as a putative marker for treatment resistance. Prospective studies, with individuals being followed from first episode psychosis until refractoriness is diagnosed, are needed to clarify these hypotheses. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据