4.2 Article

Diabetes-induced Changes in Mannan-binding Lectin Levels and Complement Activation in a Mouse Model of Type 1 Diabetes

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 77, 期 3, 页码 187-194

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sji.12027

关键词

-

资金

  1. A.P. Moller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science
  2. EFSD-JDRF-NN Research Grant
  3. Lundbeck Foundation (Lundbeck Foundation Nanomedicine Centre for Individualized Management of Tissue Damage and Regeneration (LUNA))
  4. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF13OC0003820] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circulating mannan-binding lectin (MBL) levels are elevated in type 1 diabetes. Further, high MBL levels are associated with the development of diabetic nephropathy. In animals, a direct effect of MBL on diabetic kidney changes is observed. We hypothesized that MBL levels and detrimental complement activation increase as a consequence of diabetes. We measured plasma MBL before and 7weeks after inducing diabetes by streptozotocin. Mice have two MBLs, MBL-A and MBL-C. Diabetes induction led to an increase in MBL-C concentration, whereas no change during the study was found in the control group. The increase in MBL-C was associated with the increasing plasma glucose levels. In accordance with the observed changes in circulating MBL levels, liver expression of Mbl2mRNA (encoding MBL-C) was increased in diabetes. Mbl1expression (encoding MBL-A) did not differ between diabetic and control animals. The estimated half-life of recombinant human MBL was significantly prolonged in mice with diabetes compared with control mice. Complement activation in plasma and glomeruli did not differ between groups. We demonstrate for the first time that MBL levels increase after induction of diabetes and in parallel with increasing plasma glucose. Our findings support the previous clinical observations of increased MBL in type 1 diabetes. This change may be explained by alternations in both MBL production and turnover.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据