4.2 Article

Autoantibody response to chromatographic fractions from oxidized LDL in unstable angina patients and healthy controls

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 68, 期 4, 页码 456-462

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2008.02154.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
  2. Fundacao Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Laboratorio de Investigacao Medica 38 (LIM 38)
  4. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  5. Instituto do Milenio de Fluidos Complexos
  6. Institute of Cardiology Dante Pazzanese

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Levels of autoantibodies to oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) have been correlated to atherosclerosis; however, contradictory results have been shown. To better understand the role of autoantibodies to oxLDL in atherogenesis, and their potential to predict risk of developing coronary artery disease we investigated the antibody response of unstable angina (UA) patients and healthy controls against chromatographic separated fractions of oxLDL. Five major peaks were detected after chromatographic separation of oxLDL and 10 fractions were collected. Surprisingly, when the response to high molecular weight fractions was analysed, we observed a significant increase in the levels of autoantibodies in controls compared to UA. In contrast, when the autoantibody response to intermediate and low molecular weight fractions was analysed, we observed that the UA group showed consistently higher levels compared with controls. Our data demonstrates that within oxLDL there are major fractions that can be recognized by autoantibodies from either UA patients or healthy individuals, and that the use of total oxLDL as an antigen pool may mask the presence of some antigenic molecules and their corresponding antibodies. Further studies are needed, but the analysis of antibody profiles may indeed open up a novel approach for evaluation and prevention against atherosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据