4.3 Review

The genetics of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis - status quo and beyond

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 13-23

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2014.990507

关键词

chronic inflammation; Crohn's disease; early-onset IBD; genetic risk; genome-wide association studies; inflammatory bowel disease; risk loci; SNP; ulcerative colitis

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) the Cluster of Excellence 'Inflammation at Interfaces'
  3. DFG PhD Research Training Group 'Genes, Environment and Inflammation' [1743]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The two major subtypes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ulcerative colitis (UC, MIM#191390) and Crohn's disease (CD, MIM#266600), are chronic relapsing-remitting inflammatory disorders affecting primarily the gastrointestinal tract. Prevalence rates in North America and Europe range from 21 to 246 per 100,000 for UC and 8 to 214 per 100,000 for CD. Although CD and UC share some clinical and pathological features, they can be distinguished by localization, endoscopic appearance, histology and behavior, which suggest differences in the underlying pathophysiology. The importance of genetic risk factors in disease etiology is high and has been documented more clearly for CD than for UC (relative sibling risks ls: 15-35 for CD, 6-9 for UC). The most recent and largest genetic association study for IBD, which employed genome-wide association data for over 75,000 patients and controls, established the association of 163 susceptibility loci with IBD. Although the disease variance explained by the 163 loci only amounts to 13.6% for CD and 7.5% for UC, the identified loci and the candidate genes within yielded valuable insights into the pathogenesis of IBD and the relevant disease pathways. We here review the current research on the genetics of IBD and provide insights into on current efforts as well as suggest topics for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据