4.3 Article

Serum levels of omentin, chemerin and adipsin in patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 91-97

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2010.516452

关键词

Adipokines; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; liver fibrosis; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

资金

  1. Marmara University [SAG-C-TUP-090909-0274]
  2. Turkish Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The novel adipokines omentin, chemerin, and adipsin are associated with insulin resistance and the components of the metabolic syndrome. We assayed circulating levels of these molecules and examined their association with clinical, biochemical, and histological phenotypes in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Material and methods. Serum levels of omentin, chemerin, and adipsin were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 99 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and 75 control subjects. We analyzed associations between adipokines and the characteristics of patients with NAFLD using multivariable linear regression models. Results. Adipsin levels did not differ between patients and controls, whereas both omentin and chemerin levels were significantly higher in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD than in controls (both p values <0.001). Serum omentin levels were significantly associated with C-reactive protein (r = 0.29, p < 0.01) and the degree of hepatocyte ballooning (r = 0.27, p < 0.01), whereas chemerin showed a modest association with liver fibrosis (r = 0.22, p = 0.04). After stepwise linear regression analysis adjusting for potential confounders, serum omentin levels retained their independent significance as a predictor of hepatocyte ballooning in patients with NAFLD (beta = 1.42; t = 2.79, p < 0.01). Conclusions. Our results suggest that serum omentin levels are raised in patients with NAFLD regardless of potential confounders and represent an independent predictor of hepatocyte ballooning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据