4.1 Article

Lactate metabolism in chronic liver disease

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2013.773591

关键词

Cirrhosis; galactose; kinetics; portal hypertension; Swan-Ganz catheterization

资金

  1. NovoNordisk Foundation
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Capital Region of Denmark, Foundation for Health Research
  4. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF11OC1014467, NNF13OC0006329, NNF11OC1015075] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. In the healthy liver there is a splanchnic net-uptake of lactate caused by gluconeogenesis. It has previously been shown that patients with acute liver failure in contrast have a splanchnic release of lactate caused by a combination of accelerated glycolysis in the splanchnic region and a reduction in hepatic gluconeogenesis. Aims. The aims of the present study were to investigate lactate metabolism and kinetics in patients with chronic liver disease compared with a control group with normal liver function. Methods. A total of 142 patients with chronic liver disease and 14 healthy controls underwent a liver vein catheterization. Blood samples from the femoral artery and the hepatic and renal veins were simultaneously collected before and after stimulation with galactose. Results. The fasting lactate levels, both in the hepatic vein and in the femoral artery, were higher in the patients than in the controls (P < 0.001) and there were a hepatic net-uptake of lactate in both groups. Fasting lactate concentrations correlated directly with the portal pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, and SaO(2) and negatively with ICG clearance. Conclusions. Lactate levels are elevated in cirrhotic patients compared to controls relating to portal pressure and aspects of liver dysfunction and the lactate levels seem to increase with the severity of cirrhosis. This may not be caused by decreased gluconeogenesis but merely be due to accelerated glycolysis in the splanchnic region. Future studies should focus on the impact of chronic liver disease on lactate kinetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据